Burgerim Logo

Burgerim

Burgerim Group USA, Inc.

Initial Investment Range

$194,700 to $683,000

Franchise Fee

$40,000 to $70,000

Burgerim April 3, 2019 FDD Risk Analysis

Free FDD Library AI Analysis Date: July 29, 2025

DISCLAIMER: Not Legal Advice - For Informational Purposes Only. Consult With Qualified Franchise Professionals.

1

Franchisor Stability Risks

Total: 10
4
3
3

Disclosure of Franchisor's Financial Instability

High Risk

Explanation

The financial statements for Burgerim Group USA, Inc. (Burgerim) indicate significant potential instability. The 2016 balance sheet showed a stockholder's deficit, and while later years show positive equity, this appears heavily reliant on initial franchise fee revenue rather than sustainable royalties. The 2018 statement reveals a drastic drop in cash, suggesting a high burn rate. This reliance on franchise sales for operating capital is a significant risk to the franchisor's long-term ability to support you.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your accountant must conduct a thorough review of all provided financial statements, including footnotes, to assess the company's viability and cash flow.
  • It is vital to discuss with a financial advisor the risks of investing in a system that appears to depend on franchise sales for its operational funding.
  • Seeking legal counsel to understand any state-mandated financial assurances, such as bonds or impound accounts for the initial fee, is advisable.
Citations: Item 21, Exhibit A

High Franchisee Turnover

High Risk

Explanation

Item 20 data reveals a state of hyper-growth, expanding from one unit to 109 in just two years (2017-2018), with 452 additional agreements signed but not yet open. This rate of sales far outpaces the rate of openings, suggesting the franchisor's business model may focus more on selling franchises than supporting them. Such rapid expansion creates a significant risk of future high franchisee failure and turnover due to potentially inadequate support infrastructure.

Potential Mitigations

  • A discussion with your business advisor is essential to evaluate the risks associated with investing in a hyper-growth system.
  • You should contact a wide range of franchisees from the list in Exhibit D, especially those who have been open the longest, to inquire about the quality of ongoing support.
  • Your accountant can help you model the financial impact of potential support failures or delays in opening.
Citations: Item 20, Exhibit E

Rapid System Growth

High Risk

Explanation

The system expanded from 23 to 109 franchised outlets in 2018 and disclosed having 452 franchise agreements signed for units that were not yet open. This explosive growth rate is a major red flag. It strongly suggests the franchisor's support systems for training, site selection, and operations may be overwhelmed, potentially leading to inadequate assistance for new franchisees like you. This significantly increases the risk of operational challenges and potential failure.

Potential Mitigations

  • You should ask the franchisor for specific details on their support staff size and franchisee-to-support staff ratio with help from your business advisor.
  • Inquiring with recent franchisees about their opening experience and the quality of support they received is a crucial due diligence step.
  • Legal counsel should review the franchisor's contractual support obligations to determine if they are specific and enforceable.
Citations: Item 20

New/Unproven Franchise System

High Risk

Explanation

Burgerim began franchising in 2016 and shows a very limited operating history as a franchisor. While the business concept existed prior, the ability to successfully build and manage a large, supportive franchise network is unproven. Investing in a young system carries higher risks, including the potential for an untested business model, underdeveloped support structures, and minimal brand recognition, which can directly impact your potential for success.

Potential Mitigations

  • A business advisor can help you conduct in-depth due diligence on the management team's specific experience in building and supporting a franchise system.
  • Engaging with the earliest franchisees to understand the evolution of the system and its support is highly recommended.
  • Your accountant should carefully assess the franchisor's capitalization to determine if it has sufficient funds to sustain operations and support growth.
Citations: Item 1, Item 2, Item 20, Item 21

Possible Fad Business

Medium Risk

Explanation

The business is a fast-casual restaurant offering burgers. The FDD itself notes on page 7 that the market for restaurants offering burgers is "saturated." While burgers are a staple, a concept's specific angle or branding could prove to be a short-term trend rather than a sustainable business model in a highly competitive market. You would be bound by a long-term contract even if consumer interest wanes.

Potential Mitigations

  • Engaging a business advisor to conduct independent market research on the long-term viability of this specific burger concept in your local area is crucial.
  • You should evaluate the franchisor's plans for menu innovation, marketing, and brand development to assess its strategy for long-term competitiveness.
  • Speaking with franchisees in various markets about local competition and consumer trends can provide valuable insight.
Citations: Item 1

Inexperienced Management

Medium Risk

Explanation

Item 2 shows that the key executives have operational experience in other restaurant franchise systems. However, their direct experience in managing a franchisor entity through the kind of explosive growth Burgerim was undergoing is not demonstrated. The strategy of hyper-growth itself suggests a potential lack of experience in building a sustainable franchise system, which poses a risk to the quality of long-term support you may receive.

Potential Mitigations

  • A thorough review of the executive team's specific accomplishments and roles in previous franchise systems should be conducted with your business advisor.
  • It is important to ask the franchisor about the infrastructure they have built to manage this rapid growth.
  • Inquiring with current franchisees about their direct interactions with and confidence in the leadership team is advisable.
Citations: Item 2

Private Equity Ownership

Low Risk

Explanation

This risk was not identified in the FDD Package. Private equity ownership can sometimes lead to a focus on short-term profits over the long-term health of the franchise system. This might manifest as cuts in franchisee support, increased fees, or a quick sale of the company, creating uncertainty for franchisees.

Potential Mitigations

  • If a franchisor is PE-owned, it is prudent to research the firm's history with other franchise brands with the help of a business advisor.
  • An attorney can help you understand any terms in the Franchise Agreement that permit the franchisor to be sold without your consent.
  • Discussing any changes in the system since a PE acquisition with current franchisees can provide valuable insight.
Citations: Not applicable

Non-Disclosure of Parent Company

Low Risk

Explanation

This risk was not identified in the FDD Package. A parent company's financial health and operational stability can be critical, especially if the franchisor is a smaller or newly formed subsidiary. If a franchisor is reliant on its parent for financial backing or key services, the parent's financial statements are essential for a complete risk assessment.

Potential Mitigations

  • An attorney can help investigate the corporate structure to identify any undisclosed parent companies or significant affiliate relationships.
  • If a parent company exists and provides a guarantee, your accountant should review its financial statements carefully.
  • It is wise to understand the full corporate structure to know who ultimately controls the brand and is responsible for its obligations.
Citations: Item 1, Item 21

Predecessor History Issues

Low Risk

Explanation

Item 1 discloses that Burgerim purchased the U.S. rights from an Israeli company, L.N.A. Reshet Burgerim Ltd. It also mentions a prior, unaffiliated "Predecessor" store in Los Angeles that closed. This international origin and somewhat complex history of the brand and system in the U.S. may add a layer of complexity to understanding the brand's track record and the proven nature of its operational model in the domestic market.

Potential Mitigations

  • You should ask the franchisor for more details about the system's operational history in both Israel and the U.S.
  • A business advisor can help you assess the challenges of adapting a foreign concept to the U.S. market.
  • Your attorney can review the intellectual property agreements to ensure the U.S. franchisor has clear and undisputed rights to the brand.
Citations: Item 1

Pattern of Litigation

Medium Risk

Explanation

Item 3 discloses two pending lawsuits related to real estate leases. In one case, the franchisor leased a location for a franchisee; in the other, a franchisor director guaranteed a franchisee's lease. While only two cases are listed, their specific nature points to a pattern of unusual and risky franchisor involvement in franchisee real estate matters. This entanglement could create financial instability for the franchisor and potential conflicts of interest for franchisees.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney must review the litigation details and advise on the potential impact of these liabilities on the franchisor's stability.
  • It is important to understand clearly from the franchisor what its role will be in your site selection and lease negotiations.
  • Engaging an independent real estate professional to represent your interests is highly recommended.
Citations: Item 3
2

Disclosure & Representation Risks

Total: 15
5
1
9

Explicit Franchisor Warnings / Disclosed Special Risks

High Risk

Explanation

The FDD package explicitly discloses several key risks on the State Cover Page. It warns that dispute resolution is required to take place only in California and will be governed by California law. These disclosures confirm that you may face the cost and inconvenience of out-of-state litigation or arbitration under laws that may be less favorable to you than your home state's laws. These are significant legal and financial considerations.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your franchise attorney must explain the legal and practical consequences of the California venue and choice-of-law provisions.
  • You should consult with your attorney regarding any state-specific franchise laws that may override these contractual clauses.
  • An accountant can help you budget for the potential increase in legal costs associated with an out-of-state dispute.
Citations: State Cover Page

FPRs Needing Further Explanation

Low Risk

Explanation

This risk was not identified in the FDD Package. When a franchisor provides a Financial Performance Representation (FPR), it may be based on questionable assumptions or unrepresentative data. The absence of a problematic FPR is not a risk, but if one were present, it would require intense scrutiny from you and your professional advisors to avoid making an investment based on misleading information.

Potential Mitigations

  • If an FPR is provided, an accountant should be engaged to critically analyze its assumptions and the completeness of the data.
  • It is crucial to have a business advisor help you compare any FPR data with information gathered from speaking directly with existing franchisees.
  • Your attorney can advise on the legal disclaimers that accompany an FPR and your ability to rely on the information.
Citations: Not applicable

Unrepresentative FPR Data

Low Risk

Explanation

This risk was not identified in the FDD Package. Franchisors sometimes present FPRs based on a small or cherry-picked group of high-performing outlets, which does not accurately reflect the potential results for a typical franchisee. This can create unrealistic expectations about profitability.

Potential Mitigations

  • If an FPR is based on a subset of outlets, your accountant should analyze how that subset was chosen and if it truly represents the system.
  • A business advisor can help you understand the material differences between the FPR subset and the franchise you intend to open.
  • Speaking with franchisees who are not part of the FPR sample is essential for getting a more balanced view of performance.
Citations: Not applicable

Partial FPR Expense Data

Low Risk

Explanation

This risk was not identified in the FDD Package. An FPR that shows revenues or gross profits without detailing key operating expenses can be highly misleading. Without data on costs like rent, labor, royalties, and marketing, it is impossible to accurately estimate net profitability, creating a significant risk of underestimating the financial challenges of the business.

Potential Mitigations

  • If an FPR lacks full expense data, you must work with your accountant to develop a detailed budget using information from Items 6 and 7.
  • A business advisor can help you gather expense estimates by speaking with current franchisees.
  • Your attorney can clarify that any profitability claims made outside of a complete FPR are not legally binding.
Citations: Not applicable

FPR Ignores Major Economic Events

Low Risk

Explanation

This risk was not identified in the FDD Package. Financial performance data can become outdated and misleading following major economic shifts (like a pandemic) or significant changes to the franchise system. Relying on historical data that does not reflect the current operating reality is a major risk.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your accountant should assess whether the time period covered by an FPR is still relevant to the current economic climate.
  • It is important to ask the franchisor how major events have impacted operations and financial performance since the FPR data was gathered.
  • A business advisor can help you adjust any historical data to better reflect current market conditions.
Citations: Not applicable

No FPR Provided

High Risk

Explanation

Burgerim explicitly states in Item 19 that it does not provide any Financial Performance Representation (FPR). This absence of historical financial data from the franchisor makes it significantly more challenging for you to independently assess the franchise's earnings potential and create reliable financial projections. This lack of transparency may indicate that franchisee performance varies widely or is not consistently profitable, increasing your investment risk.

Potential Mitigations

  • You must perform extensive financial due diligence by interviewing a large and diverse group of current and former franchisees about their actual revenues and expenses.
  • Working with an accountant is crucial to build your own financial projections from scratch, using conservative assumptions based on your research.
  • Your attorney will advise that you cannot rely on any informal earnings claims made by the franchisor or its representatives.
Citations: Item 19

FPR Obscures Negative Trends

Low Risk

Explanation

This risk was not identified in the FDD Package because no FPR was provided. However, if an FPR were present, it might use averages that are skewed by a few high performers, while hiding the fact that most franchisees earn significantly less. An FPR should ideally include medians, ranges, and the number of franchisees who achieve the stated results to provide a clearer picture.

Potential Mitigations

  • If an FPR is provided, your accountant should analyze the metrics used and request median data if only averages are given.
  • It is important to ask the franchisor what percentage of franchisees actually meets or exceeds the average figures presented.
  • A business advisor can help you understand the full range of potential outcomes by speaking with franchisees at all performance levels.
Citations: Not applicable

Non-Traditional FPR Metrics

Low Risk

Explanation

This risk was not identified in the FDD Package. Some franchisors provide FPRs using industry-specific metrics that may be confusing or not directly translate to profitability without significant context and explanation. Understanding these metrics is essential to avoid misinterpreting the financial potential of the business.

Potential Mitigations

  • An accountant with experience in the specific industry should be consulted to help you translate non-traditional metrics into a standard financial projection.
  • You should request that the franchisor provide clear definitions and explanations for all non-traditional metrics used.
  • Your business advisor can help you understand how these metrics compare to industry benchmarks.
Citations: Not applicable

FPR Data Mixes Outlet Types

Low Risk

Explanation

This risk was not identified in the FDD Package. An FPR that combines data from company-owned and franchisee-owned outlets can be misleading if their operations and cost structures differ significantly. Company stores may have advantages like better locations or lower costs, skewing the performance data upwards.

Potential Mitigations

  • If an FPR combines data, your accountant should request a separate breakdown for company-owned and franchisee-owned units.
  • You should ask the franchisor to explain any material differences in performance between the two types of outlets.
  • Focus your analysis on the data from franchisee-owned outlets, as it is more relevant to your situation, with guidance from a financial advisor.
Citations: Not applicable

Excluded FPR Outlet Data

Low Risk

Explanation

This risk was not identified in the FDD Package. An FPR might be made to look better by excluding data from outlets that were temporarily closed during the reporting period. Without a clear explanation of the impact of these closures, the resulting FPR could present an overly optimistic and unrepresentative picture of system performance.

Potential Mitigations

  • When reviewing an FPR, your accountant should carefully examine the methodology for any mention of excluded outlets.
  • It is important to ask the franchisor for an explanation if any outlets were excluded from the data set and why.
  • Your attorney can advise on whether such an exclusion could be considered misleading under franchise disclosure laws.
Citations: Not applicable

Obscured Material Facts

High Risk

Explanation

While the FDD discloses data, it obscures the material fact of its underlying business model. The financials in Item 21 show extreme dependence on franchise fee revenue, and Item 20 shows a staggering 452 signed agreements for unopened stores versus only 109 open ones. This strongly suggests the primary business is selling franchises, not supporting a network of profitable restaurants. This core fact about the business's nature and stability is obscured within complex tables and financials.

Potential Mitigations

  • It is critical that your accountant and attorney review the entire FDD package to piece together the true nature of the franchisor's business model.
  • You should directly question the franchisor about the high ratio of sold-but-unopened units and their plan to support them.
  • A business advisor can help you assess the immense risk of joining a system that may be structured like a sales scheme.
Citations: Item 20, Item 21

Questionable Outlet Data

High Risk

Explanation

The data in Item 20 is highly questionable. The tables show zero terminations, non-renewals, or franchisor re-acquisitions during a period of explosive growth from 1 to 109 units. This is statistically improbable and suggests the data may be misleadingly presented, perhaps because new units have not had time to fail yet. The most concerning data is the 452 signed but unopened franchises, indicating a massive backlog and potential for future systemic failure.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your accountant and attorney should treat the Item 20 data with extreme skepticism.
  • A crucial step is to contact a significant number of franchisees listed as being in operation to verify their status and experience.
  • You should ask the franchisor to explain the zero-turnover data and the large backlog of unopened stores.
Citations: Item 20

Outdated FDD Information

High Risk

Explanation

This Franchise Disclosure Document is dated April 3, 2019. As this analysis is being conducted long after that date, the information contained within is severely outdated and does not reflect the significant material events that have since transpired with the company. Making an investment decision based on this document would be extraordinarily risky, as it is not compliant with legal requirements for current information.

Potential Mitigations

  • Under no circumstances should you rely on this outdated document; your attorney must advise you of this immediately.
  • A demand for the most current, legally compliant FDD is the only appropriate action before proceeding with any evaluation.
  • It is essential to conduct independent research with a business advisor into the company's history since 2019.
Citations: Cover Page

Missing Required Agreements in FDD Package

Low Risk

Explanation

This risk was not identified in the FDD Package. Franchisees are sometimes surprised at closing with additional, mandatory agreements that were not included in the FDD. This can introduce new and unfavorable terms without adequate time for review.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney should carefully compare the list of contracts in Item 22 with the exhibits provided to ensure completeness.
  • It is crucial to get written confirmation from the franchisor that all required agreements have been disclosed before you sign anything.
  • As advised by legal counsel, you should refuse to sign any agreement that was not properly disclosed in the FDD.
Citations: Not applicable

Broker Relationship Issues

Medium Risk

Explanation

The franchisor explicitly states on the State Cover Page that it uses franchise brokers who represent the franchisor, not you. This creates a potential conflict of interest, as the broker's primary motivation is to earn a commission from the sale, not to ensure the opportunity is a good fit for you. Their statements and advice may be biased and should not be relied upon for objective guidance.

Potential Mitigations

  • You should understand that a franchise broker is a salesperson for the franchisor; do not treat them as your personal advisor.
  • It's vital to verify any information or claims made by a broker against the written FDD and through discussions with existing franchisees.
  • Retaining your own independent attorney, accountant, and business advisor is the proper way to get unbiased counsel.
Citations: State Cover Page
3

Financial & Fee Risks

Total: 10
4
4
2

Burdensome Royalty Structure

High Risk

Explanation

You are required to pay a weekly royalty of 5% of Gross Sales, which begins after the first three months of operation. In addition, you must pay a flat Brand Development Fee of $2,000 per month. This combination, especially the significant flat monthly fee, can be very burdensome, particularly for a new business with fluctuating or low initial sales volumes. These fees are payable regardless of your restaurant's profitability.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your accountant must create detailed financial projections to determine the sales volume required to comfortably cover these ongoing fees.
  • It is important to analyze the impact of the $2,000 flat monthly fee on your cash flow during low-sales periods with your financial advisor.
  • Your attorney can help you understand all fee obligations and when they commence.
Citations: Item 6, FA § 4.2, FA § 4.3

Broad 'Gross Sales' Definition

Medium Risk

Explanation

The Franchise Agreement defines "Gross Sales" to include the total selling price of all services and products, "whether for cash or credit and regardless of collection in the case of credit." This means you could pay royalties on revenue you never actually receive, such as from bad credit card payments or other uncollected debts. This effectively increases your royalty payment as a percentage of your actual collected revenue.

Potential Mitigations

  • An attorney should review this definition and advise on its potential financial impact.
  • It's advisable to discuss with your accountant how to properly track and account for revenue under this broad definition.
  • You could ask your attorney to negotiate for specific exclusions from Gross Sales, such as allowances for bad debt or credit card chargebacks.
Citations: Item 6, FA § 4.6

Unexpected Fees

High Risk

Explanation

Item 6 details a long list of potential additional fees beyond the standard royalty. These include a $10,000 transfer fee, a $10,000 renewal fee, audit costs, interest on late payments at 18%, and reimbursement of the franchisor's insurance costs plus a 10% administrative fee if you fail to maintain your own coverage. The quantity and potential magnitude of these fees could significantly and unexpectedly increase your operating costs over time.

Potential Mitigations

  • A thorough review of every fee listed in Item 6 with your accountant is necessary to budget for these potential costs.
  • Your attorney should analyze the conditions under which these fees can be imposed.
  • Speaking with current franchisees about which of these fees they have actually been charged can provide practical insight.
Citations: Item 6

Uncapped Capital Requirements

High Risk

Explanation

The Franchise Agreement requires you to perform remodels and technology upgrades at the franchisor's direction. While remodels are stated to be no more frequent than every five years, the cost is not defined or capped. Furthermore, you must comply with any changes to technology, which the agreement notes may be unpredictable. This creates the risk of significant, unbudgeted capital expenditures throughout the term of your agreement, which could strain your finances.

Potential Mitigations

  • It is crucial to discuss with your accountant the need to build a substantial capital reserve fund for future mandated upgrades.
  • You should ask the franchisor for a history of past required upgrades and their typical costs when talking to a business advisor.
  • Your attorney could attempt to negotiate for a cap on capital expenditures required in any given year.
Citations: Item 11, Item 17, FA § 7.3, FA § 21.8

Non-Refundable Initial Franchise Fee

Medium Risk

Explanation

The Initial Franchise Fee, ranging from $40,000 to $70,000, is stated to be nonrefundable in most scenarios. Even in the one case where a partial refund is possible (if a lease is not signed within six months), a significant portion of the fee is still retained by the franchisor. This places the risk of being unable to open the business, for reasons like failing to secure a site or financing, entirely on you.

Potential Mitigations

  • You should have financing and a potential site thoroughly vetted before paying any non-refundable fees, as advised by your financial advisor.
  • Your attorney can attempt to negotiate for more favorable refund conditions tied to specific milestones.
  • A clear understanding of what services the fee covers is essential; have your accountant assess the value proposition.
Citations: Item 5

Potentially High Initial Franchise Fee

Medium Risk

Explanation

The initial franchise fee is between $40,000 and $70,000. For a new and unproven franchise system with the financial weaknesses noted in Item 21, this fee may be disproportionately high compared to the value of the brand recognition and support provided. Item 5 states the fee is used for the franchisor's working capital and profit, confirming its importance to the franchisor's unstable financial model.

Potential Mitigations

  • A business advisor can help you compare this fee to those of other, more established fast-casual franchises.
  • It is important to critically assess what tangible value (training, site selection, brand) you receive for this fee with your accountant.
  • Your attorney could argue for a lower fee based on the high-risk nature of this unproven system.
Citations: Item 5, Item 21

Possibly Understated Initial Investment

High Risk

Explanation

The estimated initial investment range of $194,700 to $683,000 is extremely wide, which makes precise financial planning difficult. More alarmingly, the estimate for "Additional Funds" (working capital for the first three months) is only $5,000 to $15,000. For a new restaurant, this amount is grossly insufficient to cover initial operating losses, payroll, and unforeseen expenses, creating a high risk of undercapitalization and early business failure.

Potential Mitigations

  • You absolutely must develop your own detailed, market-specific startup budget with the help of an accountant.
  • It is critical to secure significantly more working capital than the FDD estimates, sufficient to cover expenses for at least 6 to 12 months.
  • Interviewing franchisees in your area about their actual startup costs is a necessary step to create a realistic budget.
Citations: Item 7

Third-Party Service Fees

Low Risk

Explanation

The FDD requires you to participate in and pay for a "mystery shopper" program, estimated at $800 per year. While this specific fee is disclosed and relatively small, it is part of a larger framework where the franchisor may mandate the use of, and your payment for, various third-party services. Item 8 also discloses that the franchisor earns revenue from suppliers based on your purchases, creating a conflict of interest.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your accountant should factor in all mandatory service fees when developing your financial projections.
  • It's important to ask current franchisees about any and all third-party services they are required to use and their associated costs.
  • Your attorney should review the agreement for clauses allowing the franchisor to impose new third-party service fees in the future.
Citations: Item 6, Item 8

Unfavorable Financing Terms

Medium Risk

Explanation

Item 10 states that Burgerim does not offer any direct or indirect financing. While an SBA Addendum is included, the franchisor provides no assistance in securing loans. Given that this is a young, unproven system with disclosed financial weaknesses and litigation, obtaining third-party financing from lenders like the SBA may be significantly more difficult than you anticipate, posing a major hurdle to opening your business.

Potential Mitigations

  • You should secure a written pre-approval or commitment letter for financing before signing the Franchise Agreement.
  • A financial advisor can help you prepare a comprehensive business plan and financial projections to present to lenders.
  • It is advisable to speak with multiple lenders, including those with experience in franchise financing, to understand your options.
Citations: Item 10, Exhibit B

Insufficient Time for ROI Despite Long Term

Low Risk

Explanation

This risk was not identified in the FDD Package. A franchise's term must be long enough to allow for a return on the significant initial investment. While a 10-year term with a renewal option is typical, the viability depends on the business's profitability, which is a major unknown here due to the lack of an FPR.

Potential Mitigations

  • An accountant should be consulted to create detailed, long-range financial forecasts to estimate the time required to recoup your investment.
  • Your attorney should carefully review the renewal conditions in Item 17 to ensure they do not create an unreasonable barrier to continuing the business.
  • A business advisor can help you assess whether the franchise term is appropriate given the investment level and industry norms.
Citations: Item 7, Item 17, Item 19
4

Legal & Contract Risks

Total: 16
5
5
6

Franchisor's Unilateral Right to Modify Franchise Agreement

Low Risk

Explanation

This risk was not identified in the FDD Package. Some agreements may dangerously allow the franchisor to change the core contract terms without your consent. However, the Burgerim Franchise Agreement in Section 19.2 favorably states that any changes must be mutually agreed upon in writing. This protects you from unilateral alterations to the agreement itself, though the franchisor retains broad rights to change the system via the Operations Manual.

Potential Mitigations

  • It is still critical for your attorney to confirm that no other clauses, particularly regarding the Operations Manual, could override this protection.
  • Always ensure any agreed-upon changes to the Franchise Agreement are documented in a formal, signed amendment, as advised by legal counsel.
  • An accountant can help you assess the financial impact of any proposed amendments before you agree to them.
Citations: FA § 19.2

Limitation of Franchisor's Liability

High Risk

Explanation

The Franchise Agreement includes a very broad waiver of damages. You are required to waive any right to claim punitive, special, consequential, or other damages, including lost profits. This means that even if the franchisor's actions cause your business to fail, your ability to recover your actual financial losses in a dispute could be severely limited, potentially to only direct damages, which may be much smaller.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your franchise attorney must explain the significant impact this clause has on your legal rights and potential remedies.
  • It would be prudent to ask your attorney to negotiate for the removal of this waiver, or at least to carve out exceptions for the franchisor's gross negligence or willful misconduct.
  • An insurance broker should be consulted to explore business interruption or other insurance policies that might cover some of these otherwise waived losses.
Citations: FA § 19.10

Inconsistencies Found in FDD Package

Medium Risk

Explanation

A minor but notable inconsistency exists between the franchise turnover data presented in the FDD. Item 20, Table 3, which summarizes the status of franchised outlets, reports zero outlets "Ceased Operations" for any reason in the prior three years. However, Exhibit E lists four separate franchisees who have "Left the System." This discrepancy, though small, raises questions about the accuracy and care with which the disclosure document was prepared.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney should point out this discrepancy to the franchisor and request a written clarification.
  • This finding underscores the need to conduct your own due diligence with your business advisor by contacting franchisees directly, rather than relying solely on the FDD tables.
  • An accountant should be cautious when using any of the franchisor's data for financial modeling due to potential inaccuracies.
Citations: Item 20, Exhibit E

Problematic Ancillary Agreements

High Risk

Explanation

The FDD package requires you to sign numerous ancillary agreements that create significant obligations and risks. These include a Collateral Assignment of Lease, which gives the franchisor control over your location upon default, and an Irrevocable Power of Attorney for tax matters. These agreements, which are binding contracts, contain complex legal terms that could put you at a disadvantage and must be reviewed as carefully as the main Franchise Agreement.

Potential Mitigations

  • It is absolutely essential that your franchise attorney reviews every single ancillary agreement and explains the specific risks and obligations each one creates.
  • You should not sign any ancillary document without fully understanding its purpose and potential consequences.
  • Your attorney may be able to negotiate modifications to the most problematic terms in these side agreements.
Citations: FA Exhibit B, FA Exhibit F, FA Exhibit G

Multiple Units With Different Contract Terms

Low Risk

Explanation

This risk was not identified in the FDD Package, as the documents do not appear to contemplate a multi-unit development agreement. However, in such agreements, franchisees are often required to sign the franchisor's 'then-current' unit agreement for each new location they open. This can be risky, as future agreements may contain less favorable terms, such as higher fees or reduced territory rights.

Potential Mitigations

  • If you were considering multi-unit development, your attorney would need to negotiate protections for future unit agreements.
  • A business advisor could help assess the risks of committing to a development schedule under uncertain future contract terms.
  • An accountant can model the potential financial impact of less favorable terms in future franchise agreements.
Citations: Not applicable

Integration Clauses Attempting to Limit Franchisee's Claims

High Risk

Explanation

The Franchise Agreement contains a standard integration clause stating it represents the entire agreement. More significantly, you are required to sign a detailed Acknowledgment Statement (Exhibit J) in which you affirm that you have not relied on any financial projections or promises made outside of the written FDD. Franchisors use these clauses to make it very difficult for you to bring a legal claim based on misleading statements made by a salesperson or broker.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney will advise that any crucial promise or representation made to you must be put in writing and incorporated into the Franchise Agreement as an addendum.
  • You must answer the questions in the Acknowledgment Statement truthfully; do not sign it if it contains inaccurate statements.
  • It is essential to document all important communications with the franchisor and its representatives, and to share them with your attorney.
Citations: FA § 19.2, Exhibit J

Agreement Isn't Really Negotiable

Medium Risk

Explanation

The provided Franchise Agreement is a lengthy, complex legal document drafted by the franchisor's counsel to heavily favor the franchisor's interests. Such agreements are typically presented as non-negotiable. This power imbalance means you will be bound by many one-sided terms that impose significant obligations and risks on you, while granting broad discretionary powers to the franchisor. This is a fundamental risk in nearly all franchise systems.

Potential Mitigations

  • You must retain an experienced franchise attorney to conduct a thorough review and explain every clause and its potential impact on your business.
  • While major economic terms are rarely negotiable, your attorney may be able to negotiate changes to other important provisions.
  • The primary mitigation is to fully understand all your risks and obligations before you decide to sign the agreement.
Citations: FA

Undefined Key Terms

Medium Risk

Explanation

The Franchise Agreement uses critical legal terms that are not clearly defined, creating ambiguity. For example, you are required to use "commercially reasonable efforts" to achieve "optimum sales," and a "material default" can lead to termination. The lack of objective, measurable definitions for such terms allows the franchisor to interpret them subjectively, which could put you at a disadvantage in a dispute over your performance.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney should attempt to negotiate for more precise, objective definitions for key terms in the agreement.
  • Where possible, vague standards should be replaced with specific, measurable benchmarks.
  • It is important to document your performance and compliance efforts to defend against subjective claims of breach, as advised by your attorney.
Citations: FA § 6.1, FA § 17.1.3

Undefined 'Material Breach' Term

Medium Risk

Explanation

The agreement allows for your termination based on a "material default" or "material breach," but it does not provide a comprehensive, objective definition of what constitutes "material." This ambiguity gives the franchisor significant power to declare a default for an issue you might consider minor, potentially putting your entire investment at risk based on their subjective judgment.

Potential Mitigations

  • A discussion with your attorney is needed to understand the risks of this ambiguity.
  • Your attorney could propose adding a clause that defines a material breach as one that causes significant, demonstrable harm to the franchisor or the brand.
  • Meticulous documentation of your compliance with all system standards is a key defense against a subjective default claim.
Citations: FA Art. 17

Vague 'Effort' Standards

Low Risk

Explanation

The Franchise Agreement requires you to use "commercially reasonable efforts" to operate the business and achieve "optimum sales." This standard is subjective and not defined with any specific, measurable actions or results. This vagueness could make it difficult for you to defend against a claim by the franchisor that you are not fulfilling your obligations under the agreement.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney could request that this be changed to a more objective standard, such as operating in compliance with the Operations Manual.
  • It is advisable to create and follow a detailed business plan, which can serve as evidence of your efforts.
  • Regularly communicating with the franchisor about your business activities can help build a record of your performance.
Citations: FA § 6.1

Mandatory and Confidential Arbitration

Medium Risk

Explanation

The Franchise Agreement requires you to resolve all disputes through binding arbitration. These proceedings are often private, preventing public knowledge of disputes, which benefits the franchisor. While the agreement itself does not mention confidentiality, it is a common feature of arbitration. The various state addenda attached to the FDD modify the arbitration rules for residents of those states, indicating a complex and state-dependent legal landscape for dispute resolution.

Potential Mitigations

  • You must have your franchise attorney explain the full implications of the arbitration clause, including the loss of your right to a court trial.
  • Your attorney should also review the applicable state addendum for your state to see how it may alter your dispute resolution rights.
  • Understanding the potential costs of arbitration, which can be substantial, is an important discussion to have with your accountant.
Citations: FA § 19.7, State Addenda

Shortened Statute of Limitations Period

Low Risk

Explanation

This risk was not identified in the FDD Package. Franchise agreements sometimes include clauses that drastically shorten the legal time limit (statute of limitations) for you to bring a claim against the franchisor. This can cause you to forfeit valid legal rights if you don't act very quickly after a dispute arises. The absence of such a clause here is a positive factor.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney should always confirm the absence of any clause that shortens the statute of limitations.
  • If such a clause were present, legal counsel would need to advise on its enforceability under your state's laws.
  • It is always prudent to consult an attorney immediately if you believe you have a legal claim, regardless of the limitation period.
Citations: Not applicable

Distant Forum for Disputes

High Risk

Explanation

The Franchise Agreement mandates that any arbitration or litigation must take place in Los Angeles County, California. This is explicitly highlighted as a risk factor. For a franchisee located elsewhere, this presents a significant disadvantage, requiring you to incur substantial travel, time, and expense to resolve a dispute. It also gives the franchisor a 'home court' advantage.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney must advise you on the enforceability of this clause, as some states have laws that may void out-of-state forum requirements.
  • Budgeting for potential increased legal expenses due to this clause is a necessary step for your accountant to undertake.
  • Your attorney might attempt to negotiate for dispute resolution to occur in a neutral location, though this is often difficult.
Citations: State Cover Page, FA § 19.8

Unfavorable Choice of Law

High Risk

Explanation

The agreement requires that California law be used to interpret the contract and resolve disputes. This is also disclosed as a key risk factor. The laws of California may offer fewer protections to franchisees compared to the laws of your home state, particularly regarding termination, renewal, and non-compete agreements. This can significantly affect the outcome of any legal dispute.

Potential Mitigations

  • It is essential that your franchise attorney is familiar with both California franchise law and your home state's laws to advise on the differences.
  • You should ask your attorney if any franchise relationship laws in your state are mandatory and would override this choice-of-law clause.
  • Understanding how California courts interpret key franchise agreement provisions is critical before signing.
Citations: State Cover Page, FA § 19.8

Class Action Waiver

Low Risk

Explanation

This risk was not identified in the FDD Package. Many modern franchise agreements require franchisees to waive their right to participate in a class action lawsuit. This forces each franchisee to pursue claims individually, which can be too expensive and inefficient for addressing systemic problems. The absence of this waiver is a positive aspect of this agreement.

Potential Mitigations

  • An attorney should always check for the presence of a class action waiver in the dispute resolution section.
  • If a waiver exists, legal counsel can advise on its enforceability, which can vary.
  • The ability to join with other franchisees in a legal action can provide significant leverage and cost savings.
Citations: Not applicable

Waiver of Jury Trial

Low Risk

Explanation

This risk was not identified in the FDD Package. A waiver of your right to a jury trial is a common clause in franchise agreements, often included as part of a mandatory arbitration provision. While this agreement does require arbitration (which does not involve a jury), it does not contain a separate, explicit waiver for any court proceedings that may occur. The Minnesota addendum specifically prohibits such waivers.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney will confirm that by agreeing to arbitration, you are effectively waiving your right to a jury trial for most disputes.
  • It is important to understand the differences between a judge, an arbitrator, and a jury deciding your case.
  • If a jury trial waiver were present, your attorney would advise on its legal enforceability in your jurisdiction.
Citations: Not applicable
5

Territory & Competition Risks

Total: 5
3
1
1

No Exclusive Territory

High Risk

Explanation

Item 12 clearly states that if your restaurant is located in a non-traditional site (like a mall or airport) or a major metropolitan area, you will not be granted any protected territory. This means Burgerim could allow another franchisee, or even open a company-owned store, right next to yours, creating direct competition that could severely impact your sales and viability. This lack of exclusivity is a very significant risk.

Potential Mitigations

  • It is critical to have a real estate professional and business advisor help you assess the competitive landscape before selecting a site with no territorial protection.
  • Your attorney should seek to get a very precise definition from the franchisor of what constitutes a 'major metropolitan area'.
  • You must carefully model the financial impact of potential nearby competition with your accountant.
Citations: Item 12

Ambiguous Territory Definition

Medium Risk

Explanation

The Franchise Agreement states that your exclusive territory will be described in Attachment A. However, in the provided document, Attachment A is blank. Without a clearly defined map or written description using specific boundaries (e.g., streets, zip codes, county lines), your territorial rights are ambiguous and could become a point of major dispute with the franchisor in the future.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney must insist that a clear, detailed, and unambiguous description of the territory, including a map, be completed and attached before you sign the agreement.
  • A real estate professional should review the proposed territory to ensure it is commercially viable and adequately defined.
  • You should not sign the agreement if the territory description remains blank or ambiguous.
Citations: FA Attachment A

Alternative Channel Competition

High Risk

Explanation

Even if you are granted a territory, the Franchise Agreement gives Burgerim broad and explicit rights to sell its products through "alternative distribution channels" both within and outside your territory. This includes sales on the internet, in grocery stores, and through other means. This means the franchisor can compete directly with you in your own market, potentially siphoning off customers and sales, and you will not receive any compensation for these sales.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney should attempt to negotiate for some form of revenue sharing or compensation for sales made by the franchisor through these channels in your territory.
  • It's important to have a business advisor help you assess the potential impact of this direct competition on your business model.
  • You should ask the franchisor for their current and future plans regarding sales through these alternative channels.
Citations: Item 12, FA § 1.5

Competing Brand Conflicts

Low Risk

Explanation

This risk was not identified in the FDD Package. Burgerim states in Item 12 that it does not currently operate and does not intend to establish competing brands. While this is a positive disclosure, it is important to remember that business strategies can change. The agreement does not appear to restrict the franchisor from acquiring or developing a competing system in the future.

Potential Mitigations

  • An attorney can review the franchisor's reserved rights to see if there are any clauses that could permit future competition from other brands.
  • A business advisor can help you assess the risk of a new competing brand emerging from the same franchisor in your market.
  • During due diligence, it's wise to ask the franchisor about their long-term strategic plans regarding other concepts.
Citations: Item 12

E-commerce Revenue Allocation

High Risk

Explanation

The Franchise Agreement reserves all rights for Burgerim to sell products through any method of distribution, including the internet, and states you will not receive any compensation for such sales. This creates a direct conflict where the franchisor's e-commerce efforts could pull customers away from your physical location. There is no system described for allocating revenue or giving you credit for online orders that originate from or are delivered within your territory.

Potential Mitigations

  • The risks of this direct, uncompensated online competition should be thoroughly discussed with your attorney and business advisor.
  • Your attorney could attempt to negotiate a policy for revenue sharing or a fulfillment fee for online orders that you service or that are delivered in your area.
  • An accountant should help you model the potential negative impact of the franchisor's e-commerce sales on your projected revenue.
Citations: Item 12, FA § 1.5
6

Regulatory & Compliance Risks

Total: 10
4
2
4

Franchisee's Unlimited Personal Guaranty

High Risk

Explanation

As a principal owner, you are required to sign an 'unconditional and irrevocable' personal guaranty for all obligations of your business under the Franchise Agreement. This is a critical risk, as it bypasses any liability protection from your corporate entity (like an LLC or corporation) and puts your personal assets—such as your home, savings, and other investments—at risk to satisfy any debts or legal judgments against the franchised business.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney must explain the full scope of this personal liability and the assets it puts at risk.
  • While difficult, your attorney could attempt to negotiate a cap on the guaranty amount or have it expire after a certain number of years of good performance.
  • A discussion with your financial advisor about asset protection strategies is essential before signing an unlimited guaranty.
Citations: FA Controlling Principals Guaranty

Spousal Guaranty Required

High Risk

Explanation

The Franchise Agreement's definition of "Principals" explicitly includes the spouse of an individual franchisee. Since all Principals are typically required to sign the personal guaranty, this effectively forces your spouse to personally guarantee all debts and obligations of the business, even if they have no ownership or involvement. This extends the significant financial risk of the business to your entire family's personal assets.

Potential Mitigations

  • It is crucial that your attorney challenge this requirement, as it may not be enforceable under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act unless your spouse's assets are necessary for qualification.
  • You should not allow your spouse to sign any documents without them first receiving independent legal advice from their own attorney.
  • If the guaranty is unavoidable, your attorney should fight to limit its scope or duration for your spouse.
Citations: FA § 19.17

Guaranty Survives Transfer

Low Risk

Explanation

This risk was not identified in the FDD Package. Some franchise agreements explicitly state that your personal guaranty continues even after you sell your business. While this agreement does not contain such a clause, it also doesn't provide an automatic release. The risk of remaining liable is therefore implicit and should be addressed during any transfer negotiation, but it is not an explicit contractual risk in this document.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney must make securing a full written release from your personal guaranty a non-negotiable condition of any future sale of the business.
  • During a transfer, the new buyer should be required to provide their own personal guaranty as a replacement for yours.
  • You should discuss this exit-strategy risk with your financial advisor when initially planning your investment.
Citations: Not applicable

Passive Investor Guaranties

Medium Risk

Explanation

The agreement defines "Principals" to include all individuals with an ownership interest in your franchisee entity, and all Principals are required to sign the personal guaranty. This means that even passive investors with a minority stake and no control over daily operations would be forced to accept full, unlimited personal liability for the business's debts. This can make it very difficult to attract outside investment and seems to place an unfair burden on non-managing owners.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney should negotiate to limit personal guaranties to only the active, controlling owners of the business.
  • For any passive investors, you should seek to have their guaranty capped at the amount of their individual investment.
  • Any potential investor must be advised by their own attorney about the significant personal risks of signing such a guaranty.
Citations: FA § 19.17

One-Sided Indemnification

High Risk

Explanation

The Franchise Agreement contains a very broad, one-sided indemnification clause. You are required to protect Burgerim from nearly any claim arising from your restaurant's operation, potentially even if the claim results from you following the franchisor's required procedures. However, the franchisor provides very little reciprocal indemnification to you. This shifts a disproportionate amount of legal and financial risk onto you.

Potential Mitigations

  • An insurance broker must review this clause to ensure your general liability insurance is adequate to cover these extensive contractual obligations.
  • Your attorney should attempt to negotiate for a mutual indemnification clause, where each party is responsible for its own negligence.
  • It is crucial to ask your attorney to carve out claims arising from the franchisor's own negligence or its defective system standards from your obligation.
Citations: FA Art. 15

No IP Defense Obligation

Medium Risk

Explanation

There is a contradiction between the FDD narrative and the Franchise Agreement regarding the franchisor's duty to protect the brand's trademarks. While the Franchise Agreement states the franchisor will indemnify you for proper use of the Marks, Item 13 of the FDD states they are not contractually obligated to do so. This ambiguity creates a risk that you could be left to bear the costs of defending the brand against a third-party claim.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney must seek written clarification from the franchisor to resolve this contradiction before you sign.
  • It is advisable to ask your attorney to amend the Franchise Agreement to make the franchisor's obligation to defend and indemnify the trademarks clear and unconditional.
  • Understanding your potential liability in an intellectual property dispute is a key point to discuss with legal counsel.
Citations: Item 13, FA § 9.4

Problematic Acknowledgments

High Risk

Explanation

As a condition of signing, you must complete a detailed "Franchisee Disclosure Acknowledgment Statement." This form requires you to state that you did not rely on any sales or earnings promises from the franchisor or its brokers. This document is a legal tool designed to make it very difficult for you to sue the franchisor for fraud or misrepresentation if the promises made to you during the sales process turn out to be false.

Potential Mitigations

  • You must review every question on this form with your attorney and answer each one with complete honesty.
  • If you received any verbal promises or projections that were important to your decision, you must disclose them on the form, as advised by your attorney.
  • Do not sign this acknowledgment if it contains any statements that are not true, as it could severely damage your legal rights later.
Citations: Exhibit J

Confidentiality Restrictions

Low Risk

Explanation

This risk was not identified in the FDD Package. Some franchisors use confidentiality clauses in settlement agreements to prevent former franchisees from speaking negatively, which hinders due diligence. Burgerim makes a favorable disclosure in Item 20, stating it has not used such provisions. This transparency is a positive sign and removes a potential barrier to your research.

Potential Mitigations

  • Even without such clauses, it is wise to speak with a diverse group of current and former franchisees to get a balanced perspective.
  • A business advisor can help you formulate questions to encourage candid feedback during your due diligence calls.
  • Your attorney can advise on how to interpret the information you receive from other franchisees.
Citations: Item 20

Lease/Franchise Agreement Term Mismatch

Low Risk

Explanation

This risk was not identified in the FDD Package. A mismatch between your lease term and franchise agreement term can create serious problems, such as being obligated to pay rent on a location you can no longer operate. It is your responsibility to ensure the two agreements are aligned.

Potential Mitigations

  • A real estate attorney must be engaged to negotiate a lease that is co-terminus with your Franchise Agreement, including all renewal options.
  • Your attorney should seek to include a clause in the lease that allows you to terminate it if your franchise agreement is terminated or not renewed.
  • It is important to finalize lease terms only after your franchise attorney has reviewed the Franchise Agreement term and renewal provisions.
Citations: Item 11, Item 17

Regulatory Compliance Burden

Low Risk

Explanation

This risk was not identified in the FDD Package. The restaurant industry is subject to numerous health, safety, and employment regulations. The Franchise Agreement places the full and sole responsibility for identifying and complying with all these laws on you.

Potential Mitigations

  • You must engage a local attorney to identify all permits, licenses, and regulations applicable to operating a restaurant in your specific jurisdiction.
  • Your accountant can help you budget for the costs associated with regulatory compliance, including licenses and potential professional fees.
  • A business advisor with restaurant experience can provide guidance on best practices for operational compliance.
Citations: Item 1, FA § 6.7
7

Franchisor Support Risks

Total: 4
2
2
0

Loopholes in Franchisor's Promises

High Risk

Explanation

Many of the franchisor's support obligations outlined in the agreement are qualified with vague or discretionary language, such as "as we deem advisable" or at the franchisor's "discretion." This makes the promises of support difficult to enforce. You have absolute, binding obligations to pay fees, but the franchisor's obligations to provide the services you are paying for may be illusory, creating a significant imbalance in the relationship.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney must identify all clauses that give the franchisor discretion and attempt to negotiate for more specific, objective, and mandatory support commitments.
  • It is advisable to ask current franchisees about the actual level and quality of support they receive, regardless of what the contract says.
  • You should document all requests for support and the franchisor's response, as advised by your legal counsel.
Citations: Item 11, FA

Possibly Inadequate Support/Training

High Risk

Explanation

The initial training program described in Item 11 lasts only four to six days, with a heavy emphasis on on-the-job training and only five hours of classroom orientation. For a new restaurant owner, especially in a system undergoing such chaotic growth, this level of initial training appears to be grossly inadequate. Insufficient training can lead to major operational errors, poor financial performance, and a much higher risk of business failure.

Potential Mitigations

  • You must assess your own business and restaurant experience honestly to determine if this training is sufficient for you.
  • A business advisor with industry experience should be consulted to evaluate the adequacy of the proposed training program.
  • Inquiring with recent franchisees about how prepared they felt after completing the training is a critical due diligence step.
Citations: Item 11

Opening is Conditioned on Franchisor's Approval

Medium Risk

Explanation

You cannot open your restaurant until you have fulfilled all pre-opening requirements to the franchisor's "reasonable satisfaction" and received their written authorization. While the "reasonable satisfaction" standard is better than "sole discretion," it can still be subjective. Delays in receiving necessary approvals for your site, plans, or construction could lead to costly setbacks, such as paying rent on a location that you are not yet able to operate.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney should seek to add specific timeframes to the agreement for the franchisor to grant or deny its approvals.
  • It is important to maintain open and documented communication with the franchisor throughout the pre-opening process.
  • A project manager or business advisor can help you stay on track with all pre-opening obligations to avoid giving the franchisor a reason for delay.
Citations: FA § 2.6

Vague Franchisor Consent Standards

Medium Risk

Explanation

The Franchise Agreement requires the franchisor's consent for critical actions like selling your business, but it often gives them broad discretion. While the contract may state consent "shall not be unreasonably withheld," it often fails to define what "unreasonable" means. This ambiguity could allow the franchisor to block a sale or other action for subjective reasons that are not in your best interest, creating uncertainty and potential financial harm.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney should attempt to negotiate for objective, written criteria that must be met to secure the franchisor's consent.
  • It is important to ask the franchisor to define their process and timeline for evaluating consent requests.
  • Speaking with franchisees who have gone through the transfer process can provide valuable insight into how the franchisor applies its discretion.
Citations: FA § 14.2.2
8

Operational Control Risks

Total: 12
7
2
3

Franchisor's Unilateral Right to Change System

High Risk

Explanation

The Franchise Agreement grants Burgerim the sweeping right to unilaterally change almost any aspect of the business system at any time. This includes your required products, services, equipment, and even the brand's trademarks and logos. You are required to comply with these changes at your own expense. This creates enormous uncertainty and risk, as a future change could fundamentally alter your business model or require a significant, unbudgeted investment.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney must explain the immense power this clause gives the franchisor.
  • It is advisable to ask your attorney to negotiate for limitations on this right, such as requiring changes to be economically reasonable or capping your related expenses.
  • You should discuss with current franchisees how the franchisor has used this power to change the system in the past.
Citations: FA § 19.21

Franchisee Pays for Franchisor's System Changes

High Risk

Explanation

Under the Franchise Agreement, you are required to pay the full cost of complying with any and all changes the franchisor decides to make to the system. This could include expensive new equipment, technology upgrades, or a complete remodel of your restaurant. This obligation to fund the franchisor's evolving strategy, regardless of the cost or benefit to you, represents a significant and unpredictable financial risk.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your accountant must help you plan for a substantial capital reserve fund to cover potential future mandated changes.
  • It is critical to ask your attorney to negotiate for cost-sharing with the franchisor for major, system-wide mandates.
  • A discussion with a business advisor about the franchisor's track record for imposing costly changes is a key due diligence step.
Citations: FA § 19.21

Potential for High Prices from Mandatory Suppliers

High Risk

Explanation

You are required to purchase supplies from a list of approved suppliers. The FDD discloses that in 2018, Burgerim earned over $300,000 in revenue from these suppliers based on their sales to franchisees. This is a significant conflict of interest. It suggests that you may be required to pay inflated prices for goods because the franchisor is benefiting financially from your purchases, which directly harms your profitability.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your accountant should research open-market pricing for similar goods to estimate the potential overcharge from mandated suppliers.
  • It is important to ask your attorney to negotiate for a clear and fair process to approve alternative suppliers who can meet quality standards at a lower cost.
  • You should discuss supplier pricing and quality with current franchisees to understand the real-world impact of this policy.
Citations: Item 8

Warranty Disclaimer on Mandated Equipment

Low Risk

Explanation

This risk was not identified in the FDD Package. In some franchise systems, you might be forced to buy essential, high-cost equipment 'AS IS,' with no warranty from the franchisor. If that equipment fails, you could be left with no recourse and face huge repair bills. The absence of such a clause in this FDD is a positive, but you should always verify warranty terms for any required purchases.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney should review all purchase or lease agreements for required equipment to ensure standard manufacturer warranties apply.
  • It's wise to consult with an insurance broker about equipment breakdown coverage.
  • A business advisor can help you research the reliability and service history of any mandated equipment.
Citations: Not applicable

Franchisor's Right to Reject Alternative Suppliers

High Risk

Explanation

The Franchise Agreement gives Burgerim the right to approve or disapprove any new suppliers you wish to use, but the process and criteria for this approval are at their discretion. The agreement states that the franchisor is not required to approve any particular supplier. This can effectively prevent you from finding lower-cost alternatives for non-proprietary goods, locking you into the franchisor's potentially more expensive supply chain.

Potential Mitigations

  • An important negotiation point for your attorney is to seek objective, reasonable standards for the approval of new suppliers.
  • You should request that the franchisor provide a clear, written process and timeline for evaluating potential new suppliers.
  • Discussing the real-world difficulty of getting new suppliers approved with current franchisees is essential.
Citations: FA § 7.4

Site Selection Control

High Risk

Explanation

Burgerim retains final approval over your restaurant's location and requires you to sign a Collateral Assignment of Lease. This gives the franchisor significant legal control over your physical premises. If you default on your Franchise Agreement, the franchisor can potentially take over your lease, leaving you with nothing. This level of control creates a major power imbalance and adds risk to your real estate investment.

Potential Mitigations

  • You must engage an independent real estate attorney to review the lease and the required Collateral Assignment of Lease.
  • Your attorney should attempt to negotiate the terms of the lease assignment to protect your interests in a default scenario.
  • A real estate professional should assist you in finding a location that meets both your needs and the franchisor's criteria.
Citations: FA § 2.2, FA Exhibit B

Lease Control Risks

High Risk

Explanation

The requirement to sign a Collateral Assignment of Lease gives the franchisor the right to step in and take over your lease if you default on either the lease or the Franchise Agreement (due to cross-default clauses). This creates a significant risk where you could lose your business location and potentially remain personally liable for the rent payments, even after your franchise rights have been terminated.

Potential Mitigations

  • It is absolutely critical to have a real estate attorney review the lease, the assignment, and the cross-default provisions.
  • Your attorney should attempt to negotiate for a release from your lease obligations if the franchisor chooses to take over the lease.
  • A thorough understanding of how a default under one agreement affects the other is a key discussion to have with your attorney.
Citations: FA Exhibit B, FA § 17.3

Mandatory Technology Costs

High Risk

Explanation

You are required to purchase and use the specific computer and Point of Sale (POS) systems mandated by the franchisor, with initial costs estimated up to $10,000 plus ongoing monthly fees. The Franchise Agreement gives the franchisor the right to require you to upgrade this technology at any time, at your sole expense. This creates a risk of significant, recurring, and unpredictable technology costs over the life of your franchise.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your accountant should help you budget for both the initial and potential future costs of technology upgrades.
  • It is prudent to discuss the reliability, functionality, and cost of the current required systems with existing franchisees.
  • Your attorney can attempt to negotiate for caps on technology-related fees or a more predictable upgrade schedule.
Citations: Item 11, FA Art. 21

Restrictions on What You Can and Cannot Sell

Medium Risk

Explanation

The Franchise Agreement gives Burgerim complete control over the products and services you are allowed to sell. The franchisor can add or remove menu items at its discretion. This could limit your ability to adapt your menu to local tastes or introduce new, potentially profitable items in response to market trends, thereby restricting your operational flexibility and potential revenue.

Potential Mitigations

  • A business advisor can help you assess if the current mandated menu is a good fit for your local market demographics.
  • You should clarify with the franchisor the process for proposing and getting approval for new menu items.
  • Your attorney can review the agreement to see if there is any flexibility or a 'reasonableness' standard applied to these restrictions.
Citations: Item 16, FA § 7.5

Franchisor's Control of Locally Targeted Advertising

Low Risk

Explanation

This risk was not identified in the FDD Package. It is common for franchisors to require approval of all local advertising to maintain brand consistency. While this can limit some flexibility, it also serves to protect the brand's image, which benefits all franchisees.

Potential Mitigations

  • A marketing advisor can help you develop advertising materials that are both effective for your local market and likely to be approved by the franchisor.
  • It is useful to ask the franchisor for a library of pre-approved marketing templates that you can use.
  • Your attorney can advise on the standard of approval (e.g., 'sole discretion' vs. 'reasonable') in the contract.
Citations: FA § 8.3

Forced Rebranding Costs

Medium Risk

Explanation

The Franchise Agreement explicitly gives Burgerim the right to modify or substitute the brand's trademarks, logos, and other intellectual property. If the franchisor decides to rebrand the system, you would be required to implement all changes, such as new signage and marketing materials, at your own expense. This can result in significant, unbudgeted costs.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney could attempt to negotiate for the franchisor to share in the costs of any system-wide, mandated rebranding.
  • It is important to discuss with your accountant the need to maintain a capital reserve fund for such potential future expenses.
  • A discussion with current franchisees about the history of brand changes can provide useful context.
Citations: FA § 19.21

Franchisee's Required Participation in Business (Not 'Absentee' Model)

Low Risk

Explanation

This risk was not identified in the FDD Package. The agreement requires a full-time General Manager who meets the franchisor's criteria, but it does not require you, the owner, to be that person. This provides flexibility for you to own the business as an investor rather than a full-time operator, which is a positive factor for some business models.

Potential Mitigations

  • You should clarify with the franchisor the specific qualifications required for the General Manager.
  • An accountant can help you budget for the salary and training costs of a qualified General Manager.
  • A business advisor can assist in recruiting and hiring a suitable manager who meets the franchisor's standards.
Citations: Item 15
9

Term & Exit Risks

Total: 18
10
6
2

Liability for Future Royalties

High Risk

Explanation

If your franchise is terminated for cause, you are contractually liable for liquidated damages equal to the franchisor's lost future royalties. This amount is calculated as your average monthly royalty payment multiplied by 24 months, or the number of months left on your agreement, whichever is greater. This can create a devastating financial liability, forcing you to pay for years of royalties on a business that has already failed.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney must explain the severe consequences of this liquidated damages clause.
  • It is highly advisable for your attorney to attempt to negotiate this clause out of the agreement, or at least to cap the total amount.
  • Your accountant should model this potential liability so you fully understand the financial risk you are taking on.
Citations: FA § 18.16

Broad Non-Compete

High Risk

Explanation

The post-termination non-compete covenant is extremely broad. It prohibits you from having any interest in a similar business for two years, within a 25-mile radius of ANY Burgerim restaurant in the system. Given the company's rapid growth plans, this could effectively act as a nationwide ban, severely restricting your ability to use your industry experience to earn a living after you leave the franchise.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney must advise you on the enforceability of such a broad non-compete under your state's laws, as many states would find it unreasonable.
  • It is crucial to have your attorney negotiate to limit the non-compete's geographic scope to a small radius around only your former location.
  • You should understand that this clause could significantly impact your future career options before signing.
Citations: FA § 10.3.2

Non-Compete for Passive Owners

Medium Risk

Explanation

The non-compete covenant applies to all "Controlling Principals," which is defined to include anyone with an ownership interest. This means that even a passive investor with a minority share and no operational involvement is prohibited from engaging in a competitive business after the franchise relationship ends. This unfair restriction could make it difficult to attract investors and places a significant burden on owners who have no access to the system's trade secrets.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney should strongly negotiate to have the non-compete obligation apply only to the active, managing owners of the franchise.
  • For any passive investors, you should seek a complete waiver of the post-term non-compete covenant.
  • Any potential investor must be advised by their own legal counsel of this significant post-investment restriction.
Citations: FA § 19.17, FA § 10.3

Family Member Non-Compete

Medium Risk

Explanation

The agreement attempts to bind your spouse to the non-competition covenant by including them in the definition of "Principals." This means that even if your spouse is not an owner and is not involved in the business, their ability to work in or own a similar business could be restricted if you leave the franchise. This is a significant overreach that extends the contract's restrictions to a non-signatory family member.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney should challenge the inclusion of a non-involved spouse in the non-compete covenant, as it may not be legally enforceable.
  • It is essential that your spouse obtains independent legal advice before signing any document that includes such a restriction.
  • You should seek to have the agreement explicitly state that the non-compete does not apply to the independent professional activities of your spouse.
Citations: FA § 19.17, FA § 10.3

Any Breach Can Cause Business Loss

High Risk

Explanation

The Franchise Agreement is a long and detailed contract, and you are obligated to comply with all of its terms, as well as the terms of the ever-changing Operations Manual. A failure to comply with any single provision could be deemed a default, giving the franchisor the right to terminate your franchise. This would result in the loss of your entire investment and business, making strict, ongoing compliance absolutely critical.

Potential Mitigations

  • A thorough and complete review of every obligation in the Franchise Agreement and Operations Manual with your attorney is non-negotiable.
  • Implementing a detailed compliance checklist and regular operational reviews for your management team is a critical business practice.
  • If you ever receive a notice of default from the franchisor, you must contact your attorney immediately.
Citations: FA Art. 17

Cross-Default Provisions

High Risk

Explanation

The agreement contains a cross-default clause, meaning that if you default on any other agreement with the franchisor or its affiliates (such as a lease for another location or a software license), it is automatically considered a default of this Franchise Agreement. This can create a domino effect, where a single, possibly minor, issue at one location could give the franchisor the right to terminate all of your franchises, dramatically increasing your risk.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney should attempt to negotiate this clause out of the agreement, or at least limit its scope.
  • It is important to seek a provision that each agreement stands on its own, with its own separate rights to cure any defaults.
  • Meticulous management and compliance across all your business dealings with the franchisor is essential to avoid triggering this clause.
Citations: FA § 17.3

Performance Quotas

Low Risk

Explanation

This risk was not identified in the FDD Package. Some franchisors impose minimum sales quotas or other performance metrics, and a failure to meet them can lead to penalties or even termination. This agreement does not appear to contain such provisions, which is a positive factor as it removes the risk of losing your franchise for reasons that may be outside your control, like a local economic downturn.

Potential Mitigations

  • It's always important for your attorney to confirm the absence of any performance quotas that could trigger a default.
  • You should still develop your own realistic sales projections with an accountant to ensure the business model is viable in your market.
  • A business advisor can help you assess market potential without the pressure of meeting a contractually mandated sales target.
Citations: Not applicable

Short Periods to Cure Defaults

High Risk

Explanation

The Franchise Agreement gives you very short periods to fix, or 'cure,' a default. For example, you may have only 24 hours to correct an unauthorized use of the trademarks. Several other serious defaults have no cure period at all, meaning the franchisor can terminate your agreement immediately. This high-pressure environment leaves little room for error and makes it very easy for the franchisor to terminate your franchise.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney must review the termination provisions and advise you on the risks associated with the short cure periods.
  • It may be possible for your attorney to negotiate for longer, more reasonable cure periods, especially for non-monetary defaults.
  • You must have systems in place to ensure constant compliance to avoid triggering a default that you have little or no time to fix.
Citations: FA § 17.1.3

Franchisee Lacks Termination Rights

High Risk

Explanation

The Franchise Agreement provides a long list of reasons why Burgerim can terminate your rights, but it provides you with no reciprocal right to terminate the agreement. Even if the franchisor fails to provide promised support or breaches its contractual obligations, you are still bound to the contract. This severe imbalance of power leaves you with little recourse other than costly arbitration or litigation if the franchisor does not perform.

Potential Mitigations

  • A key negotiation point for your attorney should be to add mutual termination rights, allowing you to exit the agreement if the franchisor commits a material, uncured breach.
  • You should carefully document every instance of franchisor non-performance to build a case, as advised by your attorney.
  • Understanding this one-sidedness is crucial to assessing the overall risk of the investment.
Citations: FA Art. 17

Forced Asset Sale at Termination

Medium Risk

Explanation

Upon termination or expiration, the franchisor has the option to purchase your restaurant's assets. While the agreement specifies a purchase at "fair market value" to be determined by appraisal, this process can still be disadvantageous. The franchisor is not obligated to buy, and the existence of this option may deter you from seeking a buyer on the open market. This gives the franchisor significant leverage over your exit.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney should ensure the process for determining fair market value is truly independent and impartial.
  • It is important to have your own accountant involved in any valuation process.
  • You should understand that you may not have the freedom to sell your assets to whomever you choose at the end of your term.
Citations: FA § 18.12

Surrender of Customer Data

Medium Risk

Explanation

The Franchise Agreement states that Burgerim is the exclusive owner of all data you collect, including your customer lists. They license this data back to you for use only during the term of the agreement. When the franchise ends, you lose all rights to this data. This means you lose the customer list you worked to build, which is a valuable asset, making it harder to transition to a new venture.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney could attempt to negotiate for joint ownership of customer data or the right to retain a copy for your records after termination.
  • It's important to understand the privacy policies and your responsibilities for protecting this data, which is owned by the franchisor.
  • A marketing advisor can help you develop strategies for building community relationships that may extend beyond a formal customer list.
Citations: FA § 21.2

Franchisor's Takeover Rights

High Risk

Explanation

The agreement gives Burgerim "Step-In Rights," allowing them to take over the operation of your business if they judge it to be in jeopardy. The triggers for this are subjective. If this right is exercised, you would lose control over your business and be charged for the franchisor's management expenses. This is a significant power that could be used to push you out of the system under the guise of protecting the brand.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney must seek to negotiate for clear, objective triggers for any step-in rights.
  • It is essential to clarify your rights and the financial arrangements during any period of franchisor-managed operation.
  • Constant communication and documented compliance are the best defenses against the subjective use of this clause.
Citations: FA § 19.23

Severe 'Abandonment' Definition

Low Risk

Explanation

This risk was not identified in the FDD Package. While the agreement defines ceasing operations as a default, it includes a reasonable exception for 'force majeure' events like natural disasters or pandemics, provided you act diligently to reopen. This protects you from being terminated for temporary closures that are genuinely beyond your control.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney should review the force majeure clause to ensure it is broad enough to cover a range of potential emergencies.
  • In any event of a forced closure, it is critical to communicate immediately and proactively with the franchisor and document your efforts to reopen.
  • An insurance broker can help you secure business interruption insurance to mitigate the financial impact of a forced closure.
Citations: FA § 17.1.3(e)

Difficult Renewal Terms

High Risk

Explanation

Your right to renew the franchise after the initial 10-year term is not automatic. You must meet numerous difficult conditions, including paying a $10,000 renewal fee, completing potentially expensive remodels, and signing the 'then-current' Franchise Agreement, which could have much worse terms. You must also sign a general release, giving up your right to sue the franchisor for any past issues. These conditions give the franchisor tremendous leverage at renewal.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney should attempt to negotiate for a more guaranteed right of renewal, based on your being in good standing.
  • It is crucial to try and cap future renewal fees and required remodeling expenses.
  • The requirement to sign a general release is a major concession; your attorney should advise on its implications and try to limit its scope.
Citations: FA § 3.2

Transferee Must Sign New Franchise Agreement

High Risk

Explanation

When you want to sell your business, the buyer is required to sign the Franchise Agreement that Burgerim is offering to new franchisees at that time. This future agreement could have higher fees, a smaller territory, or more restrictions than your current contract. This makes your business less valuable and harder to sell, as a buyer's potential return will be based on the less favorable, new terms.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney should try to negotiate for your buyer to have the right to assume your existing agreement.
  • A financial advisor must be consulted when you plan your exit strategy to account for the impact this clause will have on your business's resale value.
  • Understanding this is a significant long-term risk to your ability to realize the equity in your business is critical.
Citations: FA § 14.2.2(f)

Franchisor Has Broad Transfer Denial Rights

High Risk

Explanation

The Franchise Agreement gives Burgerim significant control over whether you can sell your business. While it states consent to a transfer will not be "unreasonably withheld," it also provides a long list of conditions that give the franchisor broad discretion to deny a potential buyer. This power could be used to block a sale or steer it towards a buyer preferred by the franchisor, harming your ability to exit the system on your own terms.

Potential Mitigations

  • It's important for your attorney to attempt to negotiate for more objective, clear criteria for buyer approval.
  • You should request that the franchisor provide a defined timeline and process for reviewing and approving a proposed transfer.
  • Speaking with franchisees who have sold their business can provide insight into how the franchisor has exercised this power in practice.
Citations: FA § 14.2

Franchisor's Right of First Refusal

Medium Risk

Explanation

The agreement gives Burgerim a Right of First Refusal (ROFR), meaning if you find a buyer for your business, the franchisor has the option to step in and purchase it themselves on the same terms. This can have a chilling effect on potential buyers, who may be unwilling to invest time and money in due diligence knowing the franchisor can snatch the deal away at the last minute. This may limit your pool of potential buyers and depress the sale price.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your attorney should explain the practical implications of an ROFR on your ability to sell the business.
  • It is advisable to ask your attorney to negotiate this provision out of the agreement, though this can be difficult.
  • A business broker can provide strategies for marketing a business that is subject to an ROFR.
Citations: FA § 14.4

High Transfer Fees

Medium Risk

Explanation

If you sell your business, you must pay the franchisor a transfer fee of $10,000. This fee is payable regardless of your sale price and may not reflect the franchisor's actual costs in approving the new owner. It is a significant cost that directly reduces the net proceeds you receive from the sale of your business, impacting the return on your investment.

Potential Mitigations

  • Your accountant should factor this transfer fee into all financial models related to your exit strategy and potential return on investment.
  • Your attorney could attempt to negotiate for the fee to be limited to the franchisor's actual, documented costs related to the transfer.
  • Understanding all costs associated with an exit is a critical part of your initial investment decision.
Citations: FA § 14.2.2(j)
10

Miscellaneous Risks

Total: 1
1
0
0

Unusual Franchisor Involvement in Franchisee Leases

High Risk

Explanation

Item 3 litigation reveals a concerning and unusual pattern where Burgerim or its directors have entered into leases or provided guarantees on leases for its franchisees. This deep financial entanglement in franchisee real estate creates significant potential conflicts of interest and systemic risk. If multiple of these guaranteed franchisees fail, it could trigger a cascade of liabilities that jeopardizes the financial stability of the entire franchise system.

Potential Mitigations

  • It is crucial to have your attorney investigate the nature of the franchisor's role in the site selection and leasing process.
  • A discussion with your real estate professional is necessary to understand the risks of having a franchisor as your landlord or lease guarantor.
  • Engage your financial advisor to assess the potential impact of the franchisor's lease liabilities on its overall financial stability.
Citations: Item 3